Nagarjuna
In the quiet depths of ancient Indian wisdom, there shines a luminous simile known as the firebrand circle, illuminating the subtle nature of 'chittaspanda'—the gentle vibration or throbbing of consciousness itself. Imagine a dark night and a glowing ember held in the hand. When held still, it is but a single point of pure light. Yet the moment it is whirled swiftly through the air, that solitary spark appears to draw glowing circles, arcs, and patterns across the darkness. The shapes seem solid and continuous, yet they are nothing more than the rapid movement of one unchanging flame.
So it is with the mind. Pure awareness, serene and undifferentiated, remains ever whole. But when 'chitta' begins to vibrate—when thoughts, perceptions, and impressions arise in quick succession—the world of multiplicity appears. The perceiver and the perceived, the inner and the outer, the many forms of experience, all arise like those fleeting rings of light. They dazzle the senses and engage the heart, yet they have no independent existence apart from the motion of consciousness itself.
Gaudapada and Nagarjuna regarded and often brought forth this similie to symbolize unreality. These great teachers from the traditions of Advaita and madhymika buddhism invites us not to reject the dance of life, but to recognise its source. When the firebrand is brought to rest, the illusory circle vanishes, leaving only the steady glow. In the same way, when the restless 'spanda' of the mind is stilled through quiet attention and insight, the restless patterns of thought dissolve. What remains is the serene light of pure awareness—unchanging, luminous, and free. In that stillness, one discovers the quiet joy of being, where every apparent movement is but a play of the one radiant consciousness. As I come to the concluding paragraph dealing the thoughts of gudapada , I perceive the glimer of positive idealism of the Upanishads and yet a greater optimist was to come.
Reference
Indian philosophy, p 432. S.Radhakrisnan
Gaudapada was the grand teacher of Aditya Shankara. He lived during a time when buddhism had made greater sense to the population at large and generations had become accustomed to shanikvada. Yet many philosophers of the time could feel a certain disconnect and wanted to break away from the dictums of Buddhist believes. Any radical change would face a challange. Hence it was natural for the vedantas of the time to collaborate with the madhyamiks , readapte and interpret the Upanishads.
ReplyDelete